Quant Trading Test: Evaluating an ADX Trading Strategy Claiming 83% Win Rate & 935% Return

·

Have you ever searched for the "holy grail" of trading strategies like Berry Uncle? When YouTubers and bloggers present high-win-rate, high-return strategies, do you share my curiosity—and skepticism—especially without coding skills for backtesting or time for manual verification?

Key questions arise:

After testing several strategies with real money, I remain unconvinced. Special thanks to community member Xiao Maomao for coding TradingView’s backtest feature!


Testing the "ADX Ultimate Strategy" from Speculative Lab

👉 Watch the original video: "83% Win Rate, 935% Return—ADX’s Strongest Trading Strategy"

Strategy Overview:

Long Conditions:

  1. Price above EMA 200
  2. Stochastic RSI ≤ 20 (oversold) + golden cross
  3. ADX > 50 (strong trend)

Short Conditions:

  1. Price below EMA 200
  2. Stochastic RSI ≥ 80 (overbought) + death cross
  3. ADX > 50

Claimed Results:


Berry Uncle’s Backtest Results

2022 Bear Market (Jan 1 – Aug 9)

2021 Bull Market

Combined 2021–2022 Data:


Ethereum (ETH) Performance

2022 Bear Market

2021 Bull Market

2021–2022 Total:


Optimizations & Insights

  1. Timeframe Matters:

    • BTC’s 4H chart showed 71.47% win rate (fewer trades but larger captures).
  2. ATR Adjustment:

    • Increasing ATR multiplier to 2 boosted win rates:

      • BTC: 73.08% (2022)
      • ETH: 84.38% (2022)
  3. Alternative Approach:


FAQs

Q: Is this strategy reliable for altcoins?
A: ETH’s higher win rate suggests adaptability, but test per asset.

Q: Why the discrepancy vs. original claims?
A: Execution variables (slippage, fees) and time-period selection impact results.

Q: How to improve win rates further?
A: Combine with volume indicators (e.g., OBV) or adjust ATR multipliers.


Final Thoughts

👉 Join Berry Uncle’s Trading Community for free 70%-win-rate signals

Interested in technical analysis, quant trading, or copy-trading?

Disclaimer: Past performance ≠ future results. Always test strategies with small capital first.